|
回复 freehand 的帖子
还真看到一段和K&H410的对比。不太懂英文,只能复制过来了。"Finally I had the chance to compare the barefoot MM 27s to KH 410 at my place. First of all a big thank you to cml studio for letting me have both at the same time! Both monitors play on a very high level and like two excellent red wines offer a different interpretation of the same theme.
KH 410s have a very nice 3D image with full bodied low mids and very deep low end which you would expect from the size of this monitor. The lower mids are stronger than on the barefoots and the high end is a bit softer. Orchestral music and jazz sounded spectacular on the K & H.
MM27s have equally strong low end which is quite something if you look at the different size. They seem to focus more on the upper mids. They reminded me somehow to NS 10s in this area and yes the commercial is right - it´s a nearfield with extended lows. The transient response is fantastic and much better than the K & H which all in all sounded softer. The bass response is one of the nicest which I heard until now including much bigger pmcs - dry and controlled - nice !
All in all I would say the K & H was more pleasing to listen to but the barefoots to me seem to be the better mixing tool with more "analytical" mids, fantastic transient response and huge, controlled low end.
BTW most of the other gs present agreed with me."
"Shaman"- taken from Gearslutz.com post.
Click here to read the entire thread.
|
|